Family Name: MIL
Region (NA/EU): NA
Rankings are never a bad thing to consider, but I think it's also valueable to consider those that do not wish to be ranked for whatever reason. Perhaps if you could elect to be ranked, and by doing so, enter into competition of that ranking, yielding some type of reward or benefit based on election....
What's the point if the rankings don't work as they should anyway.
The ranking shows only players on a given channel and only those logged in.
Rankings are never a bad thing to consider, but I think it's also valueable to consider those that do not wish to be ranked for whatever reason. Perhaps if you could elect to be ranked, and by doing so, enter into competition of that ranking, yielding some type of reward or benefit based on election....
I completely agree. Rankings are used to pinpoint what servers players are on. I would prefer not to be ranked at all.
The rankings are pointless when they do not account for anyone on a different server. Listing the top 30 (or is it 20) means nothing when M1 is the top rank right after the servers come up, but 30 minutes later it is G50 is the top rank. Rather than adding more, just delete the ranking all together. Then move the rankings over to the website instead, include time stamps so that anyone who is G50 is not rank 1, but the top rank would then go by who got to G50 first, second, and so on.
ik someone who got 100k quests done an they def deserver something. There was not even a title for it.