#Exploradora
Ranger Op ?
19 jul. 2023, 23:19 (UTC)
1169
11
19
17
Última modificación :
19 jul. 2023, 23:19 (UTC)
# 1
Hello on this occasion I want to make a different dynamic. I do not want to express directly what I think, but rather that users dictate the course of this debate. This review is about ranger awakening and succ. I can only suggest that its pvp damage be reduced since the ranger itself ignores the dp that the enemy has. Or in case of leaving him his absurd damage then I suggest removing that invinsible iframe perma he has. In 1v1 situations it can be very inconvenient as that gives you a huge 1v1 mele and massive tool. What do you think? The ranger is fine like this ? Or do you need an adjustment in your skill
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 01:52 (UTC)
# 2
How can you even lump awakening and succession in same conversation.. you need more practice.
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 02:20 (UTC)
# 3
yes awakening ranger is overperforming
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 02:39 (UTC)
# 4
On: Jul 20, 2023, 01:52 (UTC), Written by Inaba
How can you even lump awakening and succession in same conversation.. you need more practice.
I am opening a debate son. No one is talking about practice. I'm letting you do the rest. For me awakening is something that must be nerf right now. It's very insane how that class can play with you in a mele with its invincible.
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 02:39 (UTC)
# 5
On: Jul 20, 2023, 02:20 (UTC), Written by Mylen
yes awakening ranger is overperforming
For me awakening is something that must be nerf right now. It's very insane how that class can play with you in a mele with its invincible.
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 03:37 (UTC)
# 6
Lol ranger is one of those classes u have to play to know how to fight. Its not as broken as it looks u just dont know the match up or the class. Ranger excels at melee but its countered by ranged aoe damage/slows and classes that can kite her. She cant really sa trade u but makes up for damage during her combo. I could say the same about drak needing a nerf she is very opressive and hard to deal with vs any class without a grab and or gap close.
2
6
Lv 62
Linkle_VIII
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 03:56 (UTC)
# 7
On: Jul 20, 2023, 03:37 (UTC), Written by LinkleVII
Lol ranger is one of those classes u have to play to know how to fight. Its not as broken as it looks u just dont know the match up or the class. Ranger excels at melee but its countered by ranged aoe damage/slows and classes that can kite her. She cant really sa trade u but makes up for damage during her combo. I could say the same about drak needing a nerf she is very opressive and hard to deal with vs any class without a grab and or gap close.
The case of the Ranger is peculiar. Because the damage of awakening is very aggressive. there is no balance between his PA and the damage he inflicts on the enemy. It has a very broken iframe set for melee. Basically many current classes have a lot of problem in the melee against the Ranger. I can handle your excessive damage if. But its iframe is very annoying and above all greasy. It makes you believe that you can apply Grab and it's a lie. You are vulnerable because of it
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 04:50 (UTC)
# 8
The rest I leave to you
https://youtu.be/J-QNbjpomfs
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 08:19 (UTC)
# 9
It would seem you are a victim of skill issue unlucky
Última modificación :
20 jul. 2023, 09:18 (UTC)
# 10
On: Jul 20, 2023, 03:37 (UTC), Written by LinkleVII
Lol ranger is one of those classes u have to play to know how to fight. Its not as broken as it looks u just dont know the match up or the class. Ranger excels at melee but its countered by ranged aoe damage/slows and classes that can kite her. She cant really sa trade u but makes up for damage during her combo. I could say the same about drak needing a nerf she is very opressive and hard to deal with vs any class without a grab and or gap close.
are you implying u dont need to know how to play other classes?
100
1800
Lv 66
Seeryus
Responder