Rankings are never a bad thing to consider, but I think it's also valueable to consider those that do not wish to be ranked for whatever reason.  Perhaps if you could elect to be ranked, and by doing so, enter into competition of that ranking, yielding some type of reward or benefit based on election....

What's the point if the rankings don't work as they should anyway.
The ranking shows only players on a given channel and only those logged in.

I completely agree.  Rankings are used to pinpoint what servers players are on.  I would prefer not to be ranked at all.

The rankings are pointless when they do not account for anyone on a different server.  Listing the top 30 (or is it 20) means nothing when M1 is the top rank right after the servers come up, but 30 minutes later it is G50 is the top rank.    Rather than adding more, just delete the ranking all together.  Then move the rankings over to the website instead, include time stamps so that anyone who is G50 is not rank 1, but the top rank would then go by who got to G50 first, second, and so on.

ik someone who got 100k quests done an they def deserver something. There was not even a title for it. 

It's great to know that NA/EU players who have worked on these kinds of achievements couldn't be recognized during the 10 year infographics stats roundup. 

https://event.playblackdesert.com/global_event/10years_infographics

I have S ranks on every ecology entry but couldn't receive any recognition from infographics because the NA server has a lower ecology cap than other regions. 

Please just add ranking systems instead of infrequent and poorly collected user statistics reports. 

If it's not to add it in-game because of the issues mentionned by other adventurers, add in on the website at least ! no server dependent drama !

I support what OP suggested but even more so that there should be a highscores listing on the website.

Many other games have had such for at least 20 years already, it's dead simple to build.