Good example. Basically makes the point :D

they could basically kill 2 issues with one stone.

assign new serveres, make it so u can only reach them initially via nw/siege start ctg icon and if u r late u can swap to that server only if your guild participates and you have YES checked..

would prevent pre nw trap placement, sitting on scouted enemy bases/castle gates, out of guild scouts/assists and other "fair play" shennanigans. 

They should also introduce a gear selector for that server. Similar to how it is in AOS so capped siege is actually gear equalized siege

Hell yeah +1

Servers have actually gotten worse over the years for sieges. It's taken a backward step. Should also limit sieges to 50 (this should be a thing anyway with the current state of the game). 

Just make Val 1, Cal 1, and Med 1. Private servers used only for NWS and Sieges. 

Also bring back serendia and balenos. 

Ur absolutely right about that.

Also it might help to get Bal and Ser back and give gear caps to them, so really everyone can join. Maybe also cap them on 20 and 40 ppl. And Med with the highest gear cap now and for 50 ppl, Cal without gear cap and 75 ppl and Valencia without gear caps and 100 ppl. 

It would help a lot if guilds wouldn't need to ally up to actual fight sieges cause of needed numbers. 

agreed 100 cap is dead content in nws and shouldn exist in siege either,... 70 or so people per guild should be max max max.

yeah nw/seige specific servers where only thouse that have yes'd up to war would be able to enter has been a need for so long
and has been being asked since the dawn of time too though 

it would also get rid of ppl spying, streaming to enemy, outsiders cannon spotting etc....

This seems like quite an obvious solution to us but there may be issues on their end to implementing like this. If there isn't I'd love to see if this makes a dent in the server instability in huge fights.