roof rats don't get a lot of money with this suggestion

indeed, as they would very rarely or never camp the actual node for points. maybe if standing above node counts in 3d on start nodes :D

Good idea overall but points system would need better adjustement(kills, dmg, heals should matter a lot more) to avoid semi-afk 1600 eva strikers lying on capture points and getting in top1 ranking every game making huge money.
So much points for just staying alive on capture points is not that good idea.

With OP suggestion 30k damage done/mitigate hemm just enter RBF, die fast 6 times and u can go afk, players will block their character on wall. I have played many games  and everytime pvp content with nice rewards end like this. People will always find solution. Just leave this as it is.. just pvp for fun. Better will be if they just separate 700+ GS players and let everyone having fun, RBF is dying because new player enter and die constantly, while he cant do even 1 damage to others its not fun.

how about if u dont accumulate more points u start losing them. jsut to be sure.

The idea that reward should stay low because of an exploitable system is backward (Are exploiters /hackers really the bosses of PA? That’s the message it gives). The system need to be fix if that’s the case

but why? this doesn’t seem to apply to most of the game so why PvP?

Maybe you have seen it?, people afk grinding, they aren’t using macros, hey hold down a key with tape and walk away… you can even kill them and they don’t react for hours!

As far as I can tell, this is is allowed, a loophole in TOO/TOS. I know I have video videos it a few times now, I know other have reported it (I did once formaly report, nothing happed), but the game allows it and so does TOO/TOS (as its not 3^rd part of macro)

Seem, everyone is okay with that in PvE, but you are explaining the same problem and saying that will happen in pvp… so?

If You don’t want a system to be exploited, you put things in place; Strict TOO/TOS and policing, but that’s all effort PAs side and development cost. It can be done, if we ask for it.

PA need to understand the importance and benefits of promoting PvP in BDO, meme all you want about how bad it is, but given its scale, PA should be proud!

If we take most the argument against reward for pvp given so far; okay, let also be fair and apply that to the rest of the game? Nah, then it’s an empty argument.

they can have a number that continuously goes down and gets filled by taking dmg, dealing dmg or standing on a point.

for example it'd take 3 minutes from being capped to 0 and when it reaches 0 it sends a capcha to make sure the player isn't afk. after that point if the player is still not taking damage, dealing dmg or standing on a point for 1-2 minutes he gets kicked and barred for 30 minutes.

there are genuinely a lot of ways u can make a good afk detection system, and if u add to that a ranking that reduces the rewards by a lot at the bottom there will be no incentive to try and leech.

What you mean? i often take a seasonal into normal RBF for the fun. why? Love RBF and seasonal with it caped gear interests so few people, so no matches.

Sometimes i take a trial shai into RBF, get kills too (recorded and proven average 1-3).

if someone has huge gear and no skill, wow it’s a great feeling to take them down with no gear at all, even if it takes longer (normally someone take my kill before the marathon is over :P)

and you dont have to get one shotted, just look around and dont get hit Ez (and proven NA said in low gear, Recorded)

RBF numbers seems to have held steady (always low – 1 to 2 matches running) , over the last 2 year, with a little uptick on average over the last year. NA seems to have slightly more RBF players that EU. I play RBF a lot, both NA and EU.. and listen to what people say when I can

First PA needs to fix a bug that makes the game close after our death and welcomes us to the operating system without possibility of returning to rbf. Oh yeah, they haven't fixed it in 7 years, so they won't fix it now either.

if this feedbacks seems to be listen to then hay...maybe it's worth reporting that crash thing again, in a fuller manner. May know what’s behind that crash now, and we didn’t know before. All we could do before was say 'it crashes'. Won’t go into it here as that's not what this thread is about, but would be a lot more willing to make a full and in depth re-report of that issue if PA listen here