The Drakania are a woeful enemy. One should be most leery when prancing about Archers and Rangers the same.

I am glad of your reply, ManOfKebab!

I am pretty sure devs have access to class stats during nodewar and sieges, considering your statement about "200 kills in 2 hours war".
In particular, its easy to check how poorly succession ranger behave in contents such as Arena of Solare, a game mode with equalized gear. This reflects largescale contents like nodewar and siege too, where the class is heavily reliant on class composition to perform (needs to get babysitted) while other classes have a better impact and a less class composition reliant state, such as drakania, succession sorceress or archer.

Lets talk about archer: a "slippery" class as you stated with pretty good mobility and heavy ranged damage. Not only that, the class have hp regeneration and quite some protected cc's (also while moving protected). 

Lets analyze what Walpurga stated:
"bro just buff everything bro trust me we should get musa SA on a ranged top fragging class bro"
We can clearly agree that he is trolling by doing a simple number comparison of skills between archer and succession ranger:

• Archer: 
Pre Awakening:
Piercing Cry: super armor movement, does stiffness, 3 seconds cooldown
Meteor Dive: super armor movement, does stiffness, 5 seconds cooldown
Steady Breath: iframe into super armor movement, its possible to choose between 3 buffs: all dp +15 for 10 secs, all ap +12 for 10 secs, hp recovery 300, 5 seconds cooldown
Glide: super armor movement, movement speed +10% for 5 seconds upon use, 2 seconds cooldown
Zephyr Leap: foward guard movement (great distance covered backwards), does stiffness, 6 seconds cooldown
Awakening:
Mountain Breeze: iframe into super armor movement, 8 seconds cooldown
Uproot (core version): super armor movement (great distance covered backwards), does floating, 7 seconds cooldown
Tactical Strike: iframe (at the start of the skill) movement, does knockdown, 9 seconds cooldown
Glissade: foward guard movement (slightly foward then backwards), does knockdown on last hit, recovers 50 hp per hit and ranged ap +12 for 10 seconds, 6 seconds cooldown

Note: every skill mentioned except for Glide do attack the enemy (example the skill casts hit with % dmg, its not a "only" movement skill etc)

Succession Ranger:
Call from Sky: super armor movement (moves foward by a very little, jump) no cooldown
Twisting Wind: super armor movement, 4 seconds cooldown
Raiding the Wind: super armor movement (after twisting wind or during a normal spacebar jump, moves by a very little) 4 seconds cooldown
Evasive Landing Shot: super armor movement (moves by roughtly half distance of Zephyr Leap) does -25% movement speed debuff, 6 seconds cooldown
Evasive Explosion Shot: Iframe movement (do cover less distance compared to Zephyr Leap), does stiffness (melee range), does -25% movement speed debuff (melee range), 7 seconds cooldown
Air Explosion Shot: super armor movement (moves by a very little when going backwards after Evasive Explosion Shot, moves foward after Call from Sky but has a weird fall animation and most of the time lets you stuck mid air), 12 seconds cooldown

Note: half of the skills do only move the character (no hp regen, no damage, no buffs) and only one skill does a cc

In conclusion WhySoSeeryus its not completely wrong regarding nerf archers instead of buff others but we have to take in consideration that archer got recently buffed (both in damage and movement) and that the game has alot of damage by many classes (not only succession rangers do damage/topfrag) meaning that super armor movement is not so op as stated by Walpurga: i suggest him to write a post about archers instead, comparing them to Musas

Arena of solare is way different meta compare to the other pvp scenes, only reason succ ranger can't be classified as broken in there, it is broken in large scale pvp. Now you don't wanna nerf anything yet to buff its protection and mobility while using aos as excuse. If we gonna start buffing classes based aos we have to buff, awaken sorc, awaken sage, awaken ninja, awaken/succ warrior, succ valkyre, succ drakania, awaken/succ guardian, succ woosa, awaken mae, succ striker, awaken mystic, more i can't remember from the mind.

Your argument bad because you just want your class to be buffed while everyone else here telling you that class wrecks havoc in large scale. Just because she got shadowed by Archer, meagu, succ sage, doesn't make ranger weak at all. 

As I said as long as they nerf succ ranger damage they can buff other aspect of the class. Like mobility more protection or even reduced range. 

Till that there is no point of buffing ranger. Hope you can understand what I'm trying to say but I'm doubt 

god pls no. nerf archer instead.

Arena of solare is way different meta compare to the other pvp scenes, only reason succ ranger can't be classified as broken in there, it is broken in large scale pvp. Now you don't wanna nerf anything yet to buff its protection and mobility while using aos as excuse. If we gonna start buffing classes based aos we have to buff, awaken sorc, awaken sage, awaken ninja, awaken/succ warrior, succ valkyre, succ drakania, awaken/succ guardian, succ woosa, awaken mae, succ striker, awaken mystic, more i can't remember from the mind.

Your argument bad because you just want your class to be buffed while everyone else here telling you that class wrecks havoc in large scale. Just because she got shadowed by Archer, meagu, succ sage, doesn't make ranger weak at all. 

As I said as long as they nerf succ ranger damage they can buff other aspect of the class. Like mobility more protection or even reduced range. 

Till that there is no point of buffing ranger. Hope you can understand what I'm trying to say but I'm doubt 

Yes. U need to play well on ranger to make 200 kills in 2 hourse, while 80% classes can't get that 200 kills even if played very well.
I think its better to nerf classes like archer, maegu, zerker, drakania instead of buffing ranger that is still better then 80% of other classes.