Yes, I agree with this. I mean it worked in FFXIV. Maybe it's time BDO do the same. By rounding all these types of players up. And locked them all to a group of channels that they can't swap out of.

I mean they don't want to play with us, to the point they are demanding us to quit the game. And we don't want to play with them, to the point quite a few are requesting PvE only servers. So it seems like the sensible thing to do.

Not enough room on Arsha for more than a handful of people.  There needs to be a penalty for repeated deaths in PvP, to offset the Karma loss people suffer.  If I gotta go red to get rid of some troll, they should lose XP, have rez sickness, or an increasing death timer.

Hello,

I am appealing to you Pearl Abbys to fix the karma system in the game. I am sick of the constant griefing and karma bombing on spots by people who have lost duel for spot. This kind of toxic behavior just destroys this game and many people have stopped playing Black Desert because of it.

For many years players have been asking for this system to be remodeled because it doesn't work properly and still nothing has changed. I am fed up. How many years can we be ignored as a community? I am asking you as the next thousandth person to remodel this system or eventually remove it from the game altogether.

Not enough room on Arsha for more than a handful of people.  T

It's certainly a system that's needed an overhaul for years. There is a perverse incentive to die in pvp, since winning in pvp is actually a loss.

 This is why we see players try to feed players to mobs instead, since the system incentivizes avoiding the repeated loss of karma.

 I'd rather PA just embrace red players. Remove enhancement loss and crystal damage on death for red players (especially since we can now cleanse gear), add a bounty system that pays a few caphras for taking out a red player if an attacked player speaks to an npc in town within a few minutes of their death.

The penalty for being red should be the lack of access to main towns and settlements and the constant "threat" of being attacked by anyone. To a certain type of pvp player, that's actually a great way to add additional content to the game.

 Everyone consented to being attacked and having the option to attack at level 50, so we don't have the worries other games do with adding a pvp system on top of a pve game. The constant potential for danger is a great selling point for this game-- seeing as how so few alternatives exist on the market-- and it's an excellent reinforcement of its sandbox.

 That said, if someone doesn't want to pvp and clicked yes to get level 50 anyway, I'm all for pushing more systems that encourage those players to quit or reroll as a 49 lifeskiller. They're worth more to the game not playing (or gathering) than constantly complaining about something they volunteered to participate in.

The perverse incentive to die in pvp is the problem. Arsha's existence doesn't fix that failure of design.