History function for guild missions
Aug 29, 2023, 19:27 (UTC)
515
8
38
1
Last Edit :
Aug 29, 2023, 19:27 (UTC)
# 1
Family Name: BlizzIce
Region (NA/EU): EU
Suggestions/Comments:
Now we have the mission specialist rank for some time I would like to suggest adding a guild mission history function (as example like the guild storage history) which atleast contains who started and completed guild missions and is visible for officer+ guildranks.
Now we have the mission specialist rank for some time I would like to suggest adding a guild mission history function (as example like the guild storage history) which atleast contains who started and completed guild missions and is visible for officer+ guildranks.
I make this suggestion after I've experienced that guildquests got forfeited pretty often on purpose or by accident without knowing who did it which is annoying.
Hope there comes a solution for this like my suggestion or something like that.
greetz
Last Edit :
Aug 29, 2023, 19:53 (UTC)
# 2
Some kind of built in system for officers and higher would be nice. Just a log where you can see:
* who changed a player's role
* gave or removed protection status
* started, completed and forfeited a mission
would be nice to have.
Last Edit :
Aug 30, 2023, 03:21 (UTC)
# 3
how about they start with fixing the broken "Guild History" tab, what a mess that thing is.
105
895
Lv Private
Picklenose
Last Edit :
Aug 30, 2023, 15:19 (UTC)
# 4
On: Aug 30, 2023, 03:21 (UTC), Written by Picklenose
how about they start with fixing the broken "Guild History" tab, what a mess that thing is.
yes please
34
337
Lv Private
ShyYgirl
Last Edit :
Aug 30, 2023, 19:46 (UTC)
# 5
History was added regarding item management in the guild bank, after that has been an issue many many MANY times by griefers ruining a guild's stored goods.
We now also have a points system where people can request points for being good boys, but it is still all manual work and there is no easy way to tell who has done missions, and whatever else there is to do.
Why not combine both ideas? Have a place where it records data about which mission specialist accepts/completes guild missions, but also automatically add members who participated in these quests and how much wage they earned from it.
That can easily be used to determine who is active within the guild and who deserves a higher payout. Works way better than this silly points system that is a LOT of manual labor for guild managing positions. (GM, Advisor, Officers)
Last Edit :
Aug 30, 2023, 20:05 (UTC)
# 6
Thats actually would be a really nice QoL change for guild staff
75
309
Lv 65
Iguin_IostCore
Last Edit :
Sep 5, 2023, 03:02 (UTC)
# 7
Am 29. Aug 2023, 19:27 (UTC), von Scorrtty
Family Name: BlizzIce
Region (NA/EU): EU
Suggestions/Comments:
Now we have the mission specialist rank for some time I would like to suggest adding a guild mission history function (as example like the guild storage history) which atleast contains who started and completed guild missions and is visible for officer+ guildranks.
Now we have the mission specialist rank for some time I would like to suggest adding a guild mission history function (as example like the guild storage history) which atleast contains who started and completed guild missions and is visible for officer+ guildranks.
I make this suggestion after I've experienced that guildquests got forfeited pretty often on purpose or by accident without knowing who did it which is annoying.
Hope there comes a solution for this like my suggestion or something like that.
greetz
Yes please!
19
107
Lv 61
Tene_Tenebrae
Last Edit :
Sep 5, 2023, 08:42 (UTC)
# 8
Guild missions need a complete rework in the way that they are random and no one likes it.
People begging for others to spot the quest they want feels wrong. Same for people spamming quests that 90% don't give a fuck about.
Just allow all guilds to pick whatever quest they wnt from a list, and the select the size (no matter the size of the guild).
Having an history of who launches them on what server seems to be doable, while knowing who really completes them isn't.
Reply